octothorpe: (Default)
[personal profile] octothorpe
The music revolution, anyway.

EMI music on iTunes -- now DRM free and higher quality

256kbit AAC files Without any DRM available on iTunes, starting in May!


256k AAC is what I'd call CD quality. You don't get *nearly* the crunching in the fringes of percussion as you do in lower bitrates, unless of course, your original was poorly recorded (which, sadly, is most modern masters)

Date: 2007-04-02 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeffinthebox.livejournal.com
That's good news.

Date: 2007-04-03 01:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fj.livejournal.com
Would you opt in to this as a musician?

Date: 2007-04-03 02:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeffinthebox.livejournal.com
Probably, yes. Threre's risk, but DRM is like putting a lock on your front gate...it only keeps the honest people out.

Date: 2007-04-02 04:50 pm (UTC)
ext_173199: (The Brain)
From: [identity profile] furr-a-bruin.livejournal.com
Indeed I hope this is the beginning of a trend; if so, we might get an unquestionably legal music site that offers the kind of customer choice in codec and encoding rate that AllOfMP3 does.

I like the idea that if I'm willing to pay a bit extra, I can get my files in a format like FLAC or perhaps Apple Lossless. If not - I like being able to choose between MP3, AAC, Ogg Vorbis (my favorite), WMA, and so on.

Date: 2007-04-02 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theoctothorpe.livejournal.com
But you're never going to get a choice at the iTunes Store, as that goes against their user experience guidelines. Having a single click to download lowers the barrier of entry for people. Most get confused when confronted with jargon. Alas, we're not "the mainstream". I too, would like to see a lossless DL, but for right now, a 256k AAC file is "good enough".

Date: 2007-04-02 05:50 pm (UTC)
ext_173199: (Dance!)
From: [identity profile] furr-a-bruin.livejournal.com
Oh, it wouldn't be iTunes, though in a post-DRM world I would find it very difficult to understand why they wouldn't find a way to offer Apple Lossless.

It just strikes me that there's a lot of people who are very particular about their music. Some of them (like me) have favorite audio codecs; while I honestly can't hear a difference between Vorbis and AAC - I prefer Vorbis because it's nonproprietary and unencumbered by patents. A site that caters to such people - by offering codec (including lossless options) and bitrate choice would appeal to such people.

I don't know if you've ever used AllOfMP3, but you set up your "favorite" codec/bitrate when you first join, and while you can choose something else for a particular song if you want to - most purchases are an easy click-through using that preference.

Date: 2007-04-02 07:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theoctothorpe.livejournal.com
Yes, I have used AoMP3 (and love it!), but again, most people don't understand the choices. We do, so we don't even think about it, but we're the 0.001%.

The only reason I don't use Vorbis is that it's not better enough for me to migrate from AAC. AAC is an open standard, but patented (and also not free-as-in-beer). I really don't care, as I own software that gives me a license to encode. Personally, I really don't have a philosophical reason for denying software, other than non-open standard file formats.

Profile

octothorpe: (Default)
octothorpe

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags