![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From Andrew Sullivan's blog:
The Supreme Court Justice cites Jack Bauer and the Hollywood torture show "24" as relevant background for constitutional jurisprudence
From the Globe and Mail:
What would Jack Bauer do?
The Supreme Court Justice cites Jack Bauer and the Hollywood torture show "24" as relevant background for constitutional jurisprudence
From the Globe and Mail:
What would Jack Bauer do?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 11:18 pm (UTC)Yah
Date: 2007-06-19 07:36 pm (UTC)Justice Ginsburg has recently really lashed out at the conservative justices on the bench with a very vocal dissent, pretty much saying the decisions the court has issued were about politics, and not about law.
the failures of the legislatures
Date: 2007-06-19 10:35 pm (UTC)So the decisions come down to nine individuals. I know if I were a Supreme Court Justice I wouldn't resign either - something like $200,000 a year for life and no one to answer too? We might be more like ancient Rome than we would like to be. Except we don't want politicians that have sex. (evil grin)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 01:40 am (UTC)